[StBernard] Katrina victims face insurers in milestone trial

Westley Annis westley at da-parish.com
Mon Jul 10 23:49:06 EDT 2006


Updated: 6:57 p.m. CT July 10, 2006
GULFPORT, Miss. - A federal judge Monday began hearing a groundbreaking
trial that could signal whether thousands of people whose homes were
destroyed by Hurricane Katrina can receive payouts for losses their
insurance companies claim were caused by flooding.

Attorneys for Paul and Julie Leonard claim the couple was misled by their
insurance agent and then denied much of their claim for their Pascagoula
home without a full review of the facts.

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. argues that while wind damage is covered by
its homeowners' policies, damage from flooding is excluded, including
Katrina's wind-driven storm surge.

The trial, being heard without a jury by U.S. District Judge L. T. Senter
Jr., is the first among hundreds of lawsuits that have been filed by Gulf
Coast homeowners challenging insurance companies over the wind-verses-water
issue. Plaintiffs' attorneys hope a ruling in the homeowners' favor would
pressure insurance companies to pay out hundreds of millions of dollars in
settlements for homeowners whose claims have been rejected.

Paul Leonard asked a Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. agent in 1999 if he
should get flood coverage. "You don't need that," the agent replied,
according to one of the Leonards' lawyers.

The agent did not want to write a flood policy "because he didn't make much
money off of it," attorney Zach Scruggs said in opening statements.

Scruggs and his father, Richard "Dickie" Scruggs, represent about 3,000
policyholders on Mississippi's Gulf Coast. Their law firm also has filed
suits against other insurers, including Allstate Insurance Co., Metropolitan
Life Insurance Co., State Farm Insurance Cos. and United Services Automobile
Association.

Zach Scruggs said Nationwide paid $1,600 to the Leonards for $130,000 worth
of damage to their home, several hundred yards from the Mississippi Sound
near the eastern end of the state's shoreline. He said that was $500 less
than the premiums the family paid to Nationwide that year.

"Nationwide actually made money off the Leonards as a result of Hurricane
Katrina," he said.

Dan Attridge, an attorney for the Columbus, Ohio-based company, said
evidence would show the company "has fully complied with its obligations."
He said the agent never told Leonard that flood damage was covered by his
policy or that he did not need flood insurance.

Leonard, the first witness, said that before Katrina, he had "always
considered flood as coming from a river. Storm surge doesn't happen unless
there's a hurricane."

Under questioning by the insurance company's attorney, Leonard said he did
not need separate flood coverage because his agent "explained I had
hurricane coverage."

Asked if the agent had explained why he did not need flood insurance,
Leonard responded: "No, sir. I always had a hurricane policy. Why would I
need flood on top of hurricane (coverage)?"

The first floor of the Leonard home received five feet of water during the
hurricane, forcing the family to live on the second floor during repairs.
Leonard said he has spent $30,000 of his own money on repairs, clothing and
other needs since Katina.

Zach Scruggs said weather data shows Katrina's 140 mph wind hit the
Mississippi coast three hours before any storm surge flooding. He said
Nationwide's experts ignored that evidence and wrongly blamed water for the
vast majority of the damage to the Leonards' house.

Attridge said Nationwide has paid out $230 million for 21,000 claims in
Mississippi since Katrina and an additional $220 million for its handling of
1,800 flood insurance claims under the National Flood Insurance Program.

Richard Scruggs said it was too early to discuss the case's effect on other
claims.

"A journey of a thousand miles begins with one step, and this is the first
step," he said. "It's one case. If you win it, it's a huge win. If you lose
it, you spin it the best way you can."

Nationwide spokesman Joe Case said the company looks "at each claim on a
case-by-case basis."

C 2006 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be
published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.



More information about the StBernard mailing list