[StBernard] Expanding higher ed access for low income students

[Westley Annis]

Au Contraire, Ms. Roxanne.

Hypercritism here, is not intended towards one individual who writes
about
lust, sex or comments about sexual appetite. It's not aimed at anyone
special but to the activity/deed itself. For some reason, I find
personal
jokes about sexual appetites outside of marriage (yes, it is an
institution
guided by vows, actions and collaboration). "Lightening up" makes an
assumption that that writer holds a monopoly on perhaps a better
understanding of jokes even who may assume that the reader must adhere
to it
as amusing or cater to one mindset.

Some are not amused.

However, no one should ever take my rants personally as it is my opinion
alone that makes the comment for or against a posting, so no offense is
taken or intended.

More so, I try to post as tasteful a joke as possible as not to offend
as
well. If a lustful joke was intended to stay within the family between
two
consenting adults, then it is between them and the Lord to deal with it.
Yes, John is an outgoing guy, I'm sure. Nothing wrong with that as I
suppose
I too fall into that category. Hopefully, someone (even silent thinking
ones) must agree that wars have been started over tidbits much
"lighter-in-nature" than discussing jokes about unfaithfulness.

NO problem here.

I'm a big Trekie myself having followed (and love) the original series,
circa 1960's (Capt.Kirk). In fact, the center of my argument rallies
around
keeping Pre-1970's movies/TV to heart before things got out of control
<smile>...

Wishing everyone a good day, because this is the way the Lord has asked
us
to do--so I do wish the Scurich family and the worldwide population the
best.

--jer--