[StBernard] Jindal says Craig should resign but not Vitter?

[Westley Annis]

There's a big difference here.  Senator Craig legally plead guilty to an
offense, Vitter has not.  Also, growing up Catholic I learned there are in
fact different levels of sins.  A marital affair, or prostitute affair for
that matter, doesn't strike a nerve as that involving homosexual activity.
You can argue that and try to paint it anyway you won't, but the fact
remains that one wrongful act can indeed be far worse than another - maybe
that's why different crimes have different length jail sentences?

Or to put it bluntly as only a wife (mine) can put it in proper
perspective..."if you're caught with another woman, I'll be mad as hell at
you but I can eventually forgive you for that.  But if you're caught with
another man, I'll despise you and never want to look at your face again."

Folks, I think that just about sums it up why Jindal can call for Craig's
resignation and not Vitter's.

- John Scurich
 

-----Original Message-----
Jindal says Craig should resign but not Vitter?
Aug 30th, 2007 by Dan Z. 

Back when the David Vitter scandal broke, Jindal was quoted as saying

"This is a matter for the senator to address, and it is our hope that this
is not used by others for their own political gain."

http://www.nola.com/timespic/stories/index.ssf?/base/news-8/118439744255700.
xml&coll=1

But when it comes to Senator Craig and his scandal, Jindal has called for
him to resign. Shouldn't this be a personal matter for Senator Craig to
address? Why doesn't Bobby Jindal think that this incident should be used
for political gain? Is it because Jindal is a hypocrite?

http://www.katc.com/global/story.asp?s=7005696