[StBernard] Truth behind Congress rejecting bail-out

Westley Annis Westley at da-parish.com
Tue Sep 30 08:57:23 EDT 2008


Considering liberals, why not lead the vote with Pelosi's "HELL to da Chief"
headline before the podium?? <g>

Perhaps knowing Foreign markets weigh heavily on what America does on any
given market day/or days. Perhaps a solution (which may or may not be
feasible) would be to accept 2% of their stock market industrials (Asia,
Europe, etc.) donated to the American Wall street bailout? For example, on
Tuesday's opening market in Asia, their stocks plummeted 6% when last I
looked. Knowing this, just by donating 2% to bolster the American bailout
would have saved them 4% of their market (and could have fared better). The
same could be done by Australia, and many others to bail us out
"universally" and kept their markets up as well.

--jer--




-----------------------------------------------------
Westley,

The malicious ignorance of the Democrats in Congress NEVER cease to amaze
me...even though I anticipated it. Sure enough, after the House rejected
the "bail-out" today in Congress, there was Nancy Pelosi and "Dingy" Harry
Reid from the Senate stood there blaming Republicans for "not passing the
bail out package."

Now, I realize many Americans are just plain dumb, but to play it safe and
"not" give too many people credit, has the following crossed anyone's mind:
THE DEMOCRATS CONTROL A MAJORITY OF BOTH THE U.S. HOUSE AND SENATE...SO WHAT
THE HELL DO THEY NEED THE REPUBLICANS FOR TO PASS THE PROPOSAL????????

DID THIS OCCUR TO ANYONE??? If every Republican member of either chamber of
Congress voted against it, then all the Democrats need to do is block vote
to pass it....right?

So, simple logic can only allow one to conclude that if the proposal failed
then it is because a large number of Democrats voted it down....right?

But to listen to these idiots you would swear the GOP controls the Congress.
So, that leaves the only question one could ask at this point....So why do
the Democrats want the Republicans to join them in the vote? Could it be
that Pelosi and Reid want to show bi-partisanship in passing this?...Hell
no! That's the last thing on their mind. Could it be because the Democrats
want to help out all these Wall Street investment companies they've
criticized for getting so rich off of this?....Of course not - remember,
it's "supposedly" the Republicans who are for the rich and want to help
these Wall Street clowns....but wait a second - it's the Republicans who are
voting against this????? Now this is really getting confusing!

Actually, here's the reason why the liberals want the Republicans on board:
they know this thing is likely going to fail and at best will end up costing
the American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars...so, the Democrats
want to be able at some point in the future to blame the Republicans for
this entire deal. But the problem they've run into is the House Republicans
aren't that stupid - or at least not as stupid as Pelosi and Reid might have
thought.

And....now everyone is beginning to figure out why Harry Reid and Nancy
Pelosi did NOT want John McCain flying back to D.C. to do the job the people
in Arizona elected him to do....they knew McCain was flying back to D.C. to
stand with the House Republicans. Over the next week we are all going to
learn how Reid and Pelosi bald faced lied to the public about McCain
"screwing up the process" and how he should have stayed away...and how he
didn't make any sense in the meeting with the President on Friday. Oh,
Senator McCain made perfectly good sense - it just wasn't the kind of sense
the Democrats wanted.

And if I'm wrong, then why do you think the Democrats were rushing like mad
men last Thursday to get a deal done "before" McCain made it back to
Washington. Remember Reid and company in front of the news cameras that
afternoon annoucing they had struck a deal (in an attempt to make McCain
think there was no longer any need to for him to return there), but then
moments later the House Republicans were having a press conference shouting
the had NOT reach at deal at all - just an attempt by the Democrats to
establish a smoke screen...nothing more.

Yes, all this is slowly but surely starting to come out - no matter how hard
the liberal media tries not to report it.

John Scurich





More information about the StBernard mailing list