[game_preservation] Should Wikipedia Be Responsible for Gaming's History?
Andrew Armstrong
andrew at aarmstrong.org
Sun Jan 30 08:26:28 EST 2011
Do you think the IGDA wiki would be a wikipedia source? :) If so and we
do have such a discussion I can record the results on there, ho ho ho,
meta! :D
I read a bit of that discussion...just...wow...bizarre.
Andrew
On 29/01/2011 00:25, Martin Goldberg wrote:
> How very true, haha. I actually tried turning it around and stating
> that it should't be for Wikipedia to decide one method over another.
> Rather this has become an organizational issue and that the video game
> project should just form a consensus as to what sort of divisional
> strategy (or combination thereof) fits it's needs. Most likely nobody
> will listen, as "dates" seem to be what the vocal minority is pushing
> for.
>
> Probably as good a time as any for this SIG to maybe broach the topic
> of era/generation/division again. I know we had all done a discussion
> on it previously, and I believe came the realization was a combination
> of methods needed to occur. But then the topic petered out and never
> reached a conclusion.
>
>
> Marty
More information about the game_preservation
mailing list