[game_preservation] Descriptive terms for Video Games
Rowan Kaiser
rowankaiser at gmail.com
Fri Jun 10 21:32:55 EDT 2011
I'm not sure what's wrong with calling Survival Horror "Action-Exploration."
But I find it more interesting as an attempt to standardize all games within
a conceptual framework. Given what a mess conventional genres are - go on,
label Sid Meier's Pirates! - any attempt with a finished product is noble.
Rowan
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 6:26 PM, Jim Leonard <trixter at oldskool.org> wrote:
> That looks like it was done for comedic effect. If not, then it has some
> odd choices, like Survival Horror being predominantly "Action-Exploration"?
> And Driving being "Action-Exploration-Conflict"?
>
>
> On 6/10/2011 12:49 PM, Rowan Kaiser wrote:
>
>> Another interesting resource might be the Escapist's Genre Wheel, which
>> is quite clever although I'm not sure it jumps out as being more than
>> that:
>>
>>
>> http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/issues/issue_283/8400-Introducing-The-Escapists-Genre-Wheel
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Pugh, Richard <rpugh at loc.gov
>> <mailto:rpugh at loc.gov>> wrote:
>>
>> Greetings all!
>>
>> Thank you for your suggestions; I'll be looking into them later this
>> today. Some of you asked for additional information on our project.
>>
>> Generally these terms will be used in a subject or genre heading
>> style. That is, when one searches the catalog by subject or genre,
>> these headings will be referenced. For good or ill, these terms
>> will be treated the same way as standard LCSH or LCGFH terms. As
>> such, we're looking for descriptors like "First person action" or
>> "Real time strategy;" terms that identify what a game "is" rather
>> than what it's about. For that, we can usually find a workable
>> LCSH; emphasis on "usually." Genres are a different story.
>>
>> As Mr. Handy pointed out, the LC model is not necessarily the best
>> one. In this case that's probably true. However, NAVCC is part of
>> LC, so we must use an LC-style approach. Internal politics are
>> involved. Need I say more...?
>>
>> We're hoping that if we can build a thesaurus that is "LCSH
>> compatible," the powers that be will accept it. Even so, we're
>> expecting some resistance, because the use of non-LC terms (even
>> ones from well-established thesauri), is actively discouraged, no
>> matter what the circumstances. We're facing an uphill battle, but
>> we'll do the best we can.
>>
>> One list we've been looking at is the one from Allgame:
>>
>> http://www.allgame.com/genres.php
>>
>> Perhaps if we combine this with concepts covered in the other lists,
>> we'll have a working base. I'm tinkering with the Allgame list at
>> the moment, and it has promise. I'll let you know how it turns out.
>>
>> Richard J. Pugh
>> Motion Picture, Broadcast, & Recorded Sound Division
>> National Audio-Visual Conservation Center, Library of Congress
>> (202) 707-6636 <tel:%28202%29%20707-6636> / rpugh at loc.gov
>> <mailto:rpugh at loc.gov>
>> _______________________________________________
>> game_preservation mailing list
>> game_preservation at igda.org <mailto:game_preservation at igda.org>
>>
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> game_preservation mailing list
>> game_preservation at igda.org
>> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation
>>
>
>
> --
> Jim Leonard (trixter at oldskool.org) http://www.oldskool.org/
> Check out some trippy MindCandy at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
> A child borne of the home computer wars: http://trixter.oldskool.org/
> _______________________________________________
> game_preservation mailing list
> game_preservation at igda.org
> http://six.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/game_preservation
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://six.pairlist.net/pipermail/game_preservation/attachments/20110610/8e6f01cf/attachment.htm>
More information about the game_preservation
mailing list