More continuing text for tables

David E. Wheeler david at kineticode.com
Tue Jun 23 17:04:44 EDT 2009


On Jun 23, 2009, at 11:38 AM, Michel Fortin wrote:


> And here's what I believe you meant:

>

> | Col A | Col B | Col C

> ==+=============+==========+=========

> 1 | A1 | B1 | C1

> --+-------------+----------+---------

> | a2 contains | b2 | c2

> | some long & | b2 | c2

> | interesting | b2 | c2

> 2 | commentary | B2 | C2

> --+-------------+----------+---------

> 3 | A3 | B3 | C3

>

> Which makes me believe my syntax above using explicit line

> separators may be better, even though it's much more verbose.


Yes, Simon's was not quite right. It should be:


| Col A | Col B | Col C

+-------------+----------+---------

| A1 | B1 | C1

| a2 contains | b2 | c2

: some long & : b2 : c2

: interesting : b2 : c2

: commentary : B2 : C2

| A3 | B3 | C3


See also pgsql.

Best,

David


More information about the Markdown-Discuss mailing list